Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Minor TLS draft editorial corrections (#2446)

martinduke <> Wed, 20 March 2019 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B23A131124 for <>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ob5txp6d-ShO for <>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCECF131111 for <>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:09:46 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1553112586; bh=OLPJEkqNmunhRtVr3ILHvcpnQ8t4JrVuNmQ5guPR/ew=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=CBRAzIbBV9qvKSZNxtRya20bsdSwMUiyEjHzoDoz5r/NiSI/+cQ3RFncs1rvSQcCF qrK5kynMp5Nox1aT9wFFkrBVmUmFz7W5nruuR1GU/dGJ3Al3JVYO/18GMNb/sSz4Pl bcs2HNx81hQ7zydlhYIq3QdcLHXdqpAjVFEoOyHM=
From: martinduke <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2446/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Minor TLS draft editorial corrections (#2446)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c929e0a79196_4e733fe0264d45b81062a0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:09:56 -0000

martinduke commented on this pull request.

> @@ -269,7 +271,7 @@ At a high level, there are two main interactions between the TLS and QUIC
 * The TLS component sends and receives messages via the QUIC component, with
-  QUIC providing a reliable stream abstraction to TLS.
+  QUIC providing a reliable stream and record abstraction to TLS.

I don't want to hold up this PR forever on this point, but do @mt and @mikkelfj still disagree that QUIC is providing a record abstraction?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: