IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify the minimum packet size required for QUIC (#69)

martinduke <notifications@github.com> Wed, 28 December 2016 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E3F129686 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:42:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.783
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.783 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9U1g1ZHDB-hf for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:42:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o4.sgmail.github.com (o4.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A429E12954B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:42:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=NTeCvYqy5tJJzT3rrQLTbtuYUqs=; b=Aiqv7cnyB1xUzxnb OR85V775C2Ltcq/deQD8a2yXsVcOqMS1FCtnkI4YpjRvF+X7QYyrSbmaQartq4R3 6JYyK59f307VtE91ZK0LUKSuhGSfN1wAilBUGmhNNNEhZgsvM5Awh1GXUZxU7ytg fy5mqBzC9ZN1XXLY0I5ZHurem3A=
Received: by filter1119p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1119p1mdw1-1054-586423CF-1A 2016-12-28 20:42:55.392014783 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0006p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id aKel8nf1TAWisYzxEQkcOQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 20:42:55.238 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:42:55 -0800
From: martinduke <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/69/269537900@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/69@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/69@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify the minimum packet size required for QUIC (#69)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_586423cf25370_2fed3f8473a2713c474887"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak14Yh1OVXvMF0o36ZTOHRrlDH7JVwHBydcjBR tvRu9hY95QHzWTA+7f4jO04sMrs4ibOHEIFL4sNkM0GOp0AiBn2qoWnXn6LiLYA3ULSUmUptrNWv/c xy8ViU212wPu/uSthwQ7NKFZGZBIMzbY9A5rJ+uKTYjyLM5rjUhE4R6fKEPnPMWj4m5kMPOQO9xkbx w=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/SF5Wfn0nSB03TqbxxsKr229GDWM>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 20:42:59 -0000

The other question here is, "what do we do if the reported path MTU is less than the minimum?" I think the answer is to simply ignore the lower MTU and keep sending big packets, even if that causes fragmentation. The alternative is to have an ICMP packet that can force TCP failover.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/69#issuecomment-269537900

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status