Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe PMTU probing that includes source connection ID for routing … (#2402)

[Igor Lubashev <[e-mail]>]

igorlord commented on this pull request.



> @@ -2670,9 +2670,10 @@ complete.  Though the values of some fields in the packet header might be
 redundant, no fields are omitted.  The receiver of coalesced QUIC packets MUST
 individually process each QUIC packet and separately acknowledge them, as if
 they were received as the payload of different UDP datagrams.  For example, if
-decryption fails (because the keys are not available or any other reason), the
-the receiver MAY either discard or buffer the packet for later processing and
-MUST attempt to process the remaining packets.
+decryption fails (because the keys are not available, the UDP datagram is a PMTU
+probe (see {{pmtu-probes-src-cid}}), or any other reason), the the receiver MAY

@MikeBishop, I am trying to make sure there are no unanswered concerns left about this text.

I know you've approved the text they way it is.  So you you think it is ok as is (and we can Resolve this), or should we work on making a change similar to the one I've outlined above?  Or something else?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2402#discussion_r257326423