Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extending flags (#56)
martinduke <notifications@github.com> Tue, 06 December 2016 01:03 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AA512964D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:03:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mjgTfzf2hTX3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:03:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o1.sgmail.github.com (o1.sgmail.github.com [192.254.114.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C93112965A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:03:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=oO1914W0ZR8b8ms11e5gvkg6MNM=; b=VvQZKRJYww4b192s yFIi+ev/mfkxS0olVjwP8/WKruAUvV3dBX8o5IIAGVLZRClL1m3KRjBwJRgAeknA J750Wm8u62MQkam6fTr34xoijOvKaDv1mYNZhXnpNUwpXWYLPvIVBK+tILJAdt1g Doup0hYUeVMMtqVEBcha+FLjM9w=
Received: by filter0970p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0970p1mdw1-12492-58460E64-21 2016-12-06 01:03:32.566472947 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0006p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 32ObsZPZT5qp9LVEv5145w for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 01:03:32.471 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 17:03:32 -0800
From: martinduke <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/56/265029323@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/56@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/56@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extending flags (#56)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58460e645d5c1_296af3fe99148d130167248"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3ZwAtTC3rE31K0WDwCfqOayQv6xYElCB4OA3 0ghVx3Cw1d+TZDH0NtQnDi/QPOeER4yEjsAQU6bLf+klW6p+97Bay4+/8qR4JS1BNNOPBaCUoESYUg oCSB797BQiay108g6IYsiTV0wMDZRRLSuvXKdE/4ypcr2GCqmnbaBKY/QiO55yM9YiSg1Bv4Hri62x c=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/SYVQ--3sCT7d9SkjG9qDb637nlA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abad777e0d4def4b752c7fa52aeaf96edf933daa5f92cf00000001145dd06492a169ce0b80ca4a@reply.github.com>
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 01:03:35 -0000
In any case it might be worthwhile to spell out what's acceptable in the bounds of a version. If a given version has 6 defined flags, can there be any number of public flag bytes? If so, do I simply ignore whatever's there? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/56#issuecomment-265029323
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Extending flags (#56) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extending flags (#56) Alexis La Goutte
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extending flags (#56) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extending flags (#56) martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extending flags (#56) martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extending flags (#56) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extending flags (#56) Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extending flags (#56) Mike Bishop