Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration should be indistinguishable from a new connection (#203)

[mirjak <[e-mail]>]

I really don't support this solution because faking something to the network is unnecessary complex and therefore error prone (I think we can only do this wrong because it's fake) and probably also not really feasible given that the sender might not know that anything changed in the network. 

My solution would be the other way around: Don't make the handshake look special and try to make  all packets look the same for the network as much as possible. This goes back to the idea of "don't expose any data that you don't what the network to use because those will be ossified"and I think we should really follow this principle here as much as possible. (As a side note, this also means that there are cases where it is useful to expose information to the network and ossify this information and its representation such that it can be used for e.g.network diagnosability without changing all network devices for each version of quic.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/203#issuecomment-274605397