Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be clearer about the purpose of disable_migration (#2389)

Martin Thomson <> Thu, 28 March 2019 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACFB12031F for <>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.597
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3EXl87pzzNIj for <>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD90120170 for <>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=TIjmhZgrtxmAwMhyCTQ9ft0LcRM=; b=rtKeeDNZP4WJBiRF ngLvbGR22QUwBfZ04otpTfPe++fSHBZ/kI4bUUb+9ODEDAf+4HNxmTHdIPfI+JS/ 1Cb/bCp5WGG57gw3R1i/bjfHZdC2GxTa0jqMilBfu9e8XgsLoaGwH/Id9CdRwXPJ R68cFZPPxP6IQA/TeHoDOjlEyrw=
Received: by with SMTP id filter0555p1iad2-19469-5C9C7B89-E 2019-03-28 07:45:13.180549918 +0000 UTC m=+10406.404075077
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id tIbhOtohQLKRLBDYOn_1Ug for <>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:45:13.133 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C28326115A for <>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:45:13 +0000
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2389/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be clearer about the purpose of disable_migration (#2389)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c9c7b8917afd_18db3fc7ea4d45bc4816b5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0k76Wcx55iz1QIVRCcYmcLSbIDLD41TZ9wvJ A9DxhFmiaepFzdP0rgSmO89+UD+RkIgBA/siNnEwQn4jf7u5cKefwIk9xpbivGE7cS6ZkPKJgQ3u7P 0lwO4xjBTpsY24c0CNGYE7XmHYFS75j2/UuQQLXGCKW2Ys0MJGDPLW97yTqkW43Oa+Gyst2wtUg7i/ o=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:45:18 -0000

That sounds about right, but I draw two conclusions:

There are some editorial improvements we might consider in light of this analysis.

The pending question about what to do in those scenarios is complex, but the conclusion might just be a better explanation of the sorts of trade-offs that servers work on.  As you imply, that might be editorial as well, but I suspect that we'll uncover ways in which conflicting interpretations of working group participants come to light.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: