IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Congestion control during application limited state (#2554)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Wed, 03 April 2019 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4032120116 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYVEGkmGT2gp for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C4BC120075 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 13:00:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1554321637; bh=FpXsX3JGI4UYXNPZgBpOa/P32oF1l6lo9MGeFZlU0e4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=y8yITXuIXcLguIh19QAZXi7YNYmbrjSu1j7p0Iih6fAWmygQv6kHwrJEMzi7t43GR ok8/k8mUwYzG3NO1zCymOf5nCvzqo/IghxMf9XSdzajEmp9JHD3qJi+KaTAPikBJKV GgNftV3+Yh9OpV+5s333vhfMvG+APe6topED7DuU=
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abf14e7e006060fcd4096af264edf424cb84d3df3a92cf0000000118bcd2e592a169ce195b4fea@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2554/479637205@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2554@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2554@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Congestion control during application limited state (#2554)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ca510e5cffb7_48ef3fc3ff8d45c029514c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/SojSOaGZSzFTq1lp-mzc6shW26M>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 20:00:41 -0000

@pravb: You're right, this needs to be made crisp and we need to add pseudo-code to handle this. Do you have a strawman proposal? How does Windows TCP do currently to handle growth during app limited periods?

The naive approach doesn't work, since it prevents growth in the second RTT during slow start. I don't remember anymore what Linux TCP does, but I can look into that.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2554#issuecomment-479637205

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email