Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Authenticate connection IDs (#3499)

Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com> Sat, 09 May 2020 01:09 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0715A3A058F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 18:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.483
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EV_sLBDzzDbr for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 18:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9494A3A0418 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 18:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-b19c547.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-b19c547.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.66]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB30A960552 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 18:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1588986545; bh=aKDaLrZbE//Ga0F5FnxViyjgmnHGZQsuQSiClhcUSKk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=mT1q2tD605IYm4u9zUdhkRtIkhl2QQnCTDS07Py0+iKUBey+gyR+PMIMxTaIau+lR chRa5ZXgxN+wnFACwBgz6OBj6NszEJFDMyT2sN7jolLeDBxvhfL2YG8qEpRMYza2kH xy28b1XrsMl7MOvaOwy9ujEpzjMshLfUU4LqD4eI=
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 18:09:05 -0700
From: Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6MDMMA5ZEINPBQGLV4YHR3DEVBNHHCESD76A@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3499/review/408596258@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3499@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3499@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Authenticate connection IDs (#3499)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eb602b1ad453_7e223f8d694cd96c196718"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/SpFutgYUARPcBSPcDnAdEEgCD-8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 01:09:10 -0000

@huitema commented on this pull request.



> @@ -4786,17 +4838,28 @@ active_connection_id_limit (0x0e):
   When a zero-length connection ID is being used, the active_connection_id_limit
   parameter MUST NOT be sent.
 
+initial_connection_id (0x0f):
+
+: The value that the endpoint included in the Source Connection ID field of the
+  first Initial packet it sends during the handshake; see {{cid-auth}}.

@DavidSchinazi If you want to refer to the source CID set by the client in its first Initial packet, you should really use a different name than `initial_connection_id`, because this is widely used to refer to the initial destination CID. Maybe you should call that `initial_source_connection_id`. But using the same name for 2 concepts seems bad. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3499#discussion_r422435538