Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce HTTP/3 editorial dependence on HTTP/2 (#3264)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Tue, 07 January 2020 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC30120147 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:25:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S6nVMacBWg91 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:25:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45B5B1200E7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:25:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-292e294.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-292e294.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.102.70]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988A96E0477 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:25:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1578432314; bh=+4vD7yoNmba9raNuptcSWuqzIbj0+Pal/YPdTObQT9Y=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=1nx59ynVoG2iyX4Y5GwH5ZwDE//TIBLBgRgeL5QNc8+813AWUi7Eak+RBamzydmyg llisPopx8PyPtRsSYpMmpYfybFaoeTyF52xAljJ6SSqZlu07AFR8h2OmuQVq1nGPtA slhgZpkc8fyDaWoFzCAUcexbnUvhPR5dOPHmTW3U=
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 13:25:14 -0800
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK44TQ4IXX5S4PJ2TPV4EIU3VEVBNHHB6RWN54@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3264/571780004@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3264@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3264@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce HTTP/3 editorial dependence on HTTP/2 (#3264)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e14f73a8a64e_e393fe3148cd96c715cc"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/SxsDBwW9mQ0mig3G4DRR2QrVKEc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 21:25:17 -0000

Rereading this, I see there's a distinction between your suggestion and my previous attempts to separate them -- you want to get rid of all normative references to RFC7540, duplicating text as necessary and leaving only informative references for further reading.

Let me take a look at this.  At first pass, many of the 7540 references could be informative, but some specific sections are referenced as a whole.  I tend to think that a reference to a specific section is sufficient, but if it's small enough to copy over, that might work too.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3264#issuecomment-571780004