IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet losses may be ignored (#3450)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Mon, 24 February 2020 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51CE3A0F62 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:44:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kzHKuKQQuF5n for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:44:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4BD3A0F60 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:38:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:38:26 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1582565906; bh=2HqjIQhQKDbceG7DsMEyzbfkCNxYd8z9GKfx2v1WVT8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=VBeelqI5seZkeNSpkm/NFijpjgWBCHIcXEWCwFbpvtw6cdYT8ILYZX4c/WFEp/lIL wHjh0D1A1YSV0b0sRtpW9DlNG/IPY3rm0yr4MOdyBkFq8jLUog1U8GTqefKHlHgUNH If8/gbb+cxiIaQ+L3lgFhpEyE0fEtg6bLZMUg/n0=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2FNHZ3FW6OSVHFKUN4ME6JFEVBNHHCDFAESA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3450/review/363574037@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3450@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3450@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify which packet losses may be ignored (#3450)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e540a127af28_70d53fc2758cd968348f4"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/SyQOh6K1Ur9n1DJv9jcGRjUyjIg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:44:18 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.



> @@ -690,12 +690,14 @@ losses or increases in the ECN-CE counter.
 
 ## Ignoring Loss of Undecryptable Packets	
 
-During the handshake, some packet protection keys might not be	
-available when a packet arrives. In particular, Handshake and 0-RTT packets	
-cannot be processed until the Initial packets arrive, and 1-RTT packets	
-cannot be processed until the handshake completes.  Endpoints MAY	
-ignore the loss of Handshake, 0-RTT, and 1-RTT packets that might arrive before	
-the peer has packet protection keys to process those packets.	
+During the handshake, some packet protection keys might not be available when
+a packet arrives and the receiver can choose to drop the packet. In particular,
+Handshake and 0-RTT packets cannot be processed until the Initial packets
+arrive and 1-RTT packets cannot be processed until the handshake completes.
+Endpoints MAY ignore the loss of Handshake, 0-RTT, and 1-RTT packets that might
+have arrived before the peer has packet protection keys to process those
+packets. Endpoints MUST NOT ignore the loss of packets that were sent after
+the earliest acknowledged packet in a given packet number space.
 

How would that (not) impact the congestion controller?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3450#pullrequestreview-363574037

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email