Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reword sentence on resource allocation (#3764)

Jana Iyengar <> Mon, 15 June 2020 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326543A1170 for <>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.483
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6hAu0TncH-Yp for <>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B83BD3A116F for <>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416A28C11C9 for <>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1592256023; bh=oqN24YHha1tjFq1zFhLszXMO9S8zBUA6jbtRG++Pvg4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=nf5Z9KSaFg4JEydBUikWMNbzFpvy3gxi3FfYJTzzvK94izKO04xPq2qKnTB1PqPTF eTL9JGr3E1KzhjQA+ZFmPqQTMZmSo2opVFEXVGpuIf94yWUr1D2ND9rDBo1O0Ix7OF yx/JH6XaZr3ehNcpyuVRxqbyJ+JpDQTlFSlO5Pvc=
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:20:23 -0700
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3764/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reword sentence on resource allocation (#3764)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ee7e61731528_4f473ff0bbccd968733c5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 21:20:26 -0000

@janaiyengar commented on this pull request.

> @@ -399,9 +399,8 @@ Instead, it relies on receiving priority information from the application that
 uses QUIC.
 A QUIC implementation SHOULD provide ways in which an application can indicate
-the relative priority of streams.  When deciding the streams to which resources
-are dedicated, the implementation SHOULD use the information provided by the
+the relative priority of streams.  An implementation uses information provided
+by an application to determine how to allocate resources to active streams.

by the application to determine how to allocate resources to active streams.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: