Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-ID in Transport Parameters? (#1023)
martinduke <notifications@github.com> Mon, 08 January 2018 18:44 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AD7126E01 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 10:44:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7XV1cQxX7XN2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 10:44:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext8.iad.github.net [192.30.252.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2A6126D46 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 10:44:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 10:44:11 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1515437051; bh=9+567DHPTtUyj41g44WLDbNtBQFMOrszbX/QUYkOu5Q=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=yg/7zzRPpd/Ny0l96GY9cpPT0C1dPTdkfHyFdTq94wg0NfgQ6DiD6HeZhQYqDNfpl VJgb//mBybUsiZmxMAeRURAygPK8E0kcSfLiso7Y5RaV1M+k0qWfa8YuQm1orYqh3G mH0+287AEEZPDKYYBshRIcvomUS0MdnQlfyM6jBM=
From: martinduke <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab1313de7d2b314ca7c285f05d82964181b4cd295792cf00000001166b7dfb92a169ce10da444d@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1023/356056329@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1023@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1023@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-ID in Transport Parameters? (#1023)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a53bbfbd8177_61043ffbf993af28877a6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/TDB8YTK73UBcL8teTNXCxGwVI54>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 18:44:14 -0000
OK, I see now that this is a wash. I would have to check for zero in either case, either to reject it (if the spec disallows it) or let it through. Stepping back, it seems nonsensical that our default value is an invalid one. So either we should make it a limit with no invalid values, or change the defaults. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1023#issuecomment-356056329
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-ID in… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Martin Thomson