Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64)
Robbie Shade <notifications@github.com> Tue, 13 December 2016 01:09 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89F7129FEC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:09:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DhRT_W5hNYqV for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext6.iad.github.net [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141A8129FEB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:09:40 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1481591380; bh=xxYMgF6K+JVXTuaTEEXrs18sw5SRAaiihTWon1a+dag=; h=From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=wWy7+KD5VSHiq+12sfUrtno5rUwrVTIoOzuUEJT93Kqpkdcota/7qjOjhbsd1pqGA 9hbOpOmkbHkrClr0/cIIXBHcYwKS0q26R7da2OIxsXPCMjVco1xWvxzrmiY4jwfR6g xxlh9x7RKKhqL7NLrKmOHZkfF4XDwOjDqtes/R5E=
From: Robbie Shade <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/64/266604816@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/64@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/64@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_584f4a542ef94_17e3fb3d68d1138806a1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: rjshade
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/TKXPM8lwkImvA9ioSSz57YJ09cw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abefd3dc20d28514ccae9a622904c6830ecd9ce8de92cf0000000114670c5492a169ce0b80e2d9@reply.github.com>
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 01:09:43 -0000
What's the benefit of relying on ICMP responses vs. doing MTU discovery at the QUIC layer ("packetization layer PMTUD" RFC 4821)?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/64#issuecomment-266604816
- [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) Alexis La Goutte
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) Victor Vasiliev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) Robbie Shade
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) Patrick McManus
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (#64) Patrick McManus
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path MTU Discovery (#64) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path MTU Discovery (#64) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path MTU Discovery (#64) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path MTU Discovery (#64) Martin Thomson