Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server should not accept 1-RTT traffic before handshake completion (#3159)

Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Wed, 30 October 2019 01:27 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED0D1200F7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 18:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uSQRoPYXc9Mh for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 18:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DC8812003E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 18:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-275fa97.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-275fa97.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.64]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B211E1C169F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 18:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1572398826; bh=ykTb/EUha7S/FeV7jhySjoGuCDxdQx6vQhHD7TdhqXI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=pH1GUE8k7FPdgyfs0z2hikGeGDsEivhytlxFy2EKaGAhQIYm/FzXMcsYP0TL6mQrH wI9P35IrZ2fzlCsspXQRt9ob2bwXzaiYHytj8SSyqrx8jtGL2t2cfBpZQtqHe3VViS otskZxps9qcd6loKaPWDws/McZOKBpyAYVKTepVQ=
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 18:27:06 -0700
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2BDSW7P4SL52R74SN3YYMWVEVBNHHB5FZ3ZY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3159/547699180@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3159@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3159@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server should not accept 1-RTT traffic before handshake completion (#3159)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db8e6eaa3ab4_757e3fcf4becd95c635cb"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/TNRuor1F6Ei1xfY10X7I5qV411c>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 01:27:09 -0000

> Without changing the 1.3 key schedule QUIC could use the exporter MS to derive the client 1-RTT traffic secret.

@ad-l How does this help? Can't the exporter MS derived at the same time as the traffic secrets?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3159#issuecomment-547699180