Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Update draft-ietf-quic-transport.md (#105)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 03 January 2017 04:54 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563451293DA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 20:54:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S-vh_OY-LxzH for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 20:54:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext8.iad.github.net [192.30.252.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7BC212007C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 20:54:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 20:54:30 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1483419270; bh=3O5idIsFaFPXDMsm1uHwIG7OoKcHYfoXu1AoSLncCU0=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Vi4jAN+l0rEeWxs0K2wBcwZnbigfVZEnLVfgLxxYnS64pbGy1Fsw7wCyZ/UrsbGaS 01xa6OwlppR8EucLOdcE/kBORykqP1f2yGFznh1nEznFuRW7/lUVoBQLZBlOzHLlVx ONNjLKcMrkQ+l+u3iQWrfK0oTsj1YcfDfadO2SOs=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/105/review/14885089@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/105@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/105@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Update draft-ietf-quic-transport.md (#105)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_586b2e8695baf_6953ff459857130582b4"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/TYmIRCX8flztme09zjc_e2fiNGM>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 04:54:33 -0000
martinthomson commented on this pull request.
> -The maximum packet size for QUIC is the maximum size of the encrypted payload of
-the resulting UDP datagram. All QUIC packets SHOULD be sized to fit within the
-path's MTU to avoid IP fragmentation. The recommended default maximum packet
-size is 1350 bytes for IPv6 and 1370 bytes for IPv4. To optimize better,
-endpoints MAY use PLPMTUD {{!RFC4821}} for detecting the path's MTU and setting
-the maximum packet size appropriately.
+The maximum packet size for QUIC is the maximum size of the entire UDP payload,
+including the public header, encrypted payload, and any authentication fields.
+All QUIC packets SHOULD be sized to fit within the path's MTU to avoid IP
+fragmentation. To optimize bandwidth efficiency, endpoints SHOULD use Path MTU
+Discovery ({{!RFC1191}}, {{!RFC1981}}) for detecting the path's MTU, setting the
+maximum packet size appropriately, and storing the result of previous PMTU
+determinations.
+
+(TODO: Should there be a high minimum MTU for QUIC to avoid ICMP attacks? If so,
+does the endpoint fail over to TCP or simply allow fragmentation?)
Rather than log this here, open a separate issue.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/105#pullrequestreview-14885089
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Update draft-ietf-quic-trans… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Update draft-ietf-quic-t… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Update draft-ietf-quic-t… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Update draft-ietf-quic-t… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Update draft-ietf-quic-t… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Update draft-ietf-quic-t… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (ICMP variant) (#1… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (ICMP variant) (#1… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (ICMP variant) (#1… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD (ICMP variant) (#1… martinduke