Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS alert no_application_protocol is not always possible (#3580)

Lucas Pardue <> Thu, 16 April 2020 23:59 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5106E3A13DF for <>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.175
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.175 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.168, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6zIYVHiPHOf3 for <>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11A253A13DE for <>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D8E261639 for <>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1587081588; bh=f0hVmMus6uktwmYb4w9T9YQRgLWlKBH1aO4I+nsKeVY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=GLf5IPqlzBq4VZLngAc8QV8qkq03YhCG6gAaDPQ91/kSJNoa3iWflBoVRMF6VJtbf uCkFlrEaym1544A5CoUH8gGtVJGUqFoZEudpF9EJ9aS6pQWG3Jvq1RIkTzqtGmPB0s pBrpasIY5DN4IXBb/T5/MTRgzU3gXNx4IKrVmjDU=
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:59:48 -0700
From: Lucas Pardue <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3580/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS alert no_application_protocol is not always possible (#3580)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e98f1743df4d_2e9c3ff46e8cd9601227f1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:59:50 -0000

FWIW this particular error code is the one I've seen the most of during interop. So I will make the observation that anyone building a stack that causes an ALPN failure to not be exposed, is going to cause a lot of problems for future QUIC as a generic transport layer. 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: