Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Neccessity and viability of hidden connection migration linkage (#990)
MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Tue, 05 December 2017 20:05 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646EA12025C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:05:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.615
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.615 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RplXqLcBT79X for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:05:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o11.sgmail.github.com (o11.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC68A127B57 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:05:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=LYg6BZ/M7KF8pegTnhfCFy0Ss9I=; b=IWPVdiNinOsnkUs1 D0lTCS/+mQHlYTcqPdBebHyZb8eS3vtpLk0zmp+I9ILD2ZYLT2Lz6f9imhZCrZpK 3PqPbJJ98QCZr62yjY0fuPghO1rnpshxZgb+h64ODUxBg1YkvUdiytWyYqNU4Gxu OJwkZwwkVib30q5tzIkh7Ren3eQ=
Received: by filter1225p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1225p1mdw1-10915-5A26FBFD-26 2017-12-05 20:05:17.81483244 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0005p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id XqYtmxJYTbCqrPaIrXkevg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 20:05:17.783 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 20:05:17 +0000
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab156b9320282ef118f435ea4101158fa4b4e9f13d92cf00000001163ebdfd92a169ce10a8f624@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/990/349424680@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/990@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/990@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Neccessity and viability of hidden connection migration linkage (#990)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a26fbfda2dca_74183fac503b0f38696ce"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2Y/UxqWIQblWU32CTJFFZuTVNCqcU+SiUf3O /r9dZguEHVOn4YSEy+s5JbZ6cGjt0vFVYyRTL/QH7o/EcGd5hUeP+1NMbXCDuFXyly5WEC9oTflfvV YT+vfMu51v1DpFTMhBvXVmzt42Hb++ivP3AZ2uf9oFnYZ1MH0W/myU25o2FRsrYbUI7bzL40IDpyPO w=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/TbDm0hdtOgLEXWBucasQJRJ9kcE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 20:05:20 -0000
One thing that came to mind after writing the above is that the packet number is always transmitted modulo 2^32 or less. Thus a random gap of this range is no different from resetting the packet number assuming the oberserver does not know the real packet number of the connection. But that assumption is not safe depending on how reliably the network can be monitored by the observer. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/990#issuecomment-349424680
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Neccessity and viability of … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Neccessity and viability… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Neccessity and viability… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Neccessity and viability… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Neccessity and viability… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Neccessity and viability… janaiyengar