Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on blocking entries. (#3131)

Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com> Mon, 28 October 2019 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACBF120105 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rMyjkD6KlkFl for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4E812004E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.22.68]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F5B8C1155 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1572293852; bh=JmIC8SfypHevaKtqpUzn+52F9TAYmeUwGMgH3G4Y9jk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=XMu9br5BBYWi7+za263ABwWci5EypW2HYl30R6ys4eFrKSdadRDZAXpGQDZHqtugQ xPz3zlO3Uczyylqtz/Zjbts6xOiYe9i4167rpU7tzkqxaCYjUIkces8l8SD0s0HOAp NlgsQjclXjOWzjGhwMThQ2hRtk4KZFiEP387YY34=
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:17:32 -0700
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4FJ7N5LCPUYSOQHWF3YSGWZEVBNHHB45IJ64@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3131/c547126976@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3131@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3131@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on blocking entries. (#3131)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db74cdca2cbe_4fb03ffce00cd95c238434"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: dtikhonov
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/U28joxXJMsy8-xofi1YM0lNauCM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:17:35 -0000

I would not tie the definition of what it means for an entry to be acknowledged to an implementation.  Keeping a count of entries that have been inserted via the `Known Received Count` is just one way to do it.

The phrase "until its [the entry's] insertion has been acknowledged" is not ambiguous.  I don't agree that there is confusion to begin with.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3131#issuecomment-547126976