IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on blocking entries. (#3131)

Bence Béky <notifications@github.com> Wed, 06 November 2019 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD3F1200F4 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:04:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33ckvCsNLUU0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:04:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35E4D120072 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:04:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-25680bd.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-25680bd.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.61]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B107A083B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:04:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1573074265; bh=6l1ylfcDSVe7XGymHmBjVs2pId+HjpdXzd/Sc7Xf90c=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=M/JAFfNDCixsHTIUqQ7862LpGn9wn+uJ8xcjgvsgMfxlqL56ljMnKbqe2NDQdAx5U WvTmviT9vwNUccqYWP67MxxqUPlatXg89oYyFvRR8p81Q021IaizvKT1v4h0D6RhPz 6o9fuifuNq1rSpYKu7lBGPu4beoo/TvFI9GVVIBU=
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 13:04:25 -0800
From: Bence Béky <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2DXYZVQTT3PKBUWLN32BT5TEVBNHHB45IJ64@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3131/c550499594@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3131@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3131@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on blocking entries. (#3131)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dc335595c49a_21cf3fe449acd95c8161d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: bencebeky
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/UAm2X72Na7xosfxAzl7lxkjda7Q>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 21:04:28 -0000

> > There were
> > already four sentences starting with "Note that" throughout the draft
> > before this PR (now there are six)....
> 
> Thanks for pointing out one of my main writing tics.  The other is overuse of em-dashes.
> 
> > Did #3172 address your concerns here? If not, you may need to rebase and resolve the conflicts.
> 
> The Note Bence improved is unnecessary and gone now, but I think Bence's other changes are orthogonal to #3172 and worth keeping.

Thanks.  I rebased and rephrased as necessary.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3131#issuecomment-550499594

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status