Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry packets? (#1233)
ekr <notifications@github.com> Mon, 19 March 2018 08:06 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EF9120721 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 01:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.411
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.411 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWwcNOuBqeP6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 01:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o1.sgmail.github.com (o1.sgmail.github.com [192.254.114.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93E8D120227 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 01:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=ErSCRqSS6BIzcSRZWDo2rSrONYg=; b=tq7xTrcxH258jUZS 3UxMxdLQgE5yfJDIah4o399WtuQpd+8KoCngIabLV4SY3wOPLry+13hyOkOIwx5K vekJ+vLUWBpxxlLbYwgUxqHvO2PlGL+R0j76Ln4YS3ZJE5xfVjn7lGZ58X5AYXdd 3E1Veh9wnmVCJLzHOi3eye4Tsko=
Received: by filter0629p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0629p1las1-3701-5AAF6F72-2 2018-03-19 08:06:10.102272066 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) by ismtpd0048p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id AVD5mSmeQgKq-QVts2190g for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:06:10.002 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:06:10 +0000
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abbdc5c9451f59b55beba24736af13262d8560c5fa92cf0000000116c7317192a169ce1241ad3b@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233/374129885@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry packets? (#1233)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5aaf6f71bac22_29b22b01f796ced0299468"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2hRUTfL2VqP9E/7wCuq8l1L9GCqaPjLvyd4A GDQmM8SPd2EZUmkUhq3451fUDVLn3+d2icNcxpGoulD8Q80uL8ppYPevmZPHwybGN4N3fcUjoUvG// b33MhqghHWxYDpp3/LsyMKuk5BHrr7YRrVaz2Oq4rJiUKLi/M9MEbITkqw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/UC-xUbZNUK1wX9QgXnf-H1M2Kdk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:06:11 -0000
@siyengar: How does the client know whether it's a stateful or stateless retry? They look the same in TLS. It's just an HRR. It's only the server that knows -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233#issuecomment-374129885
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry packe… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… Martin Thomson