Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify conditions for disabling spin bit (#3296)

Kazuho Oku <> Wed, 11 December 2019 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC76120086 for <>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:00:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OeaE9LorOxuk for <>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15FF0120059 for <>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:00:04 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1576029604; bh=R0vkVKPxZ1kreUr9FsWMbM7pc9ZQJsIZRk3Cv6gQEPA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=e+ayyYwayjrDEcgNaD1977TpI2/3H7Ode9/FStseup0q6pDOKtvCg0rcDbMhSgBuV 5+cc2BwOUORy097n5qnQR1KZqWOEHY+wRdmc7M92lZS+uOOBTKSqZ43mo3n27YCA0Y f9bqZUXhcNDgm33LJjkrlKJmQdBWaA1yCtmjmI/k=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3296/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify conditions for disabling spin bit (#3296)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5df04da435608_6e8b3f82a7acd9601499fb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 02:00:07 -0000

kazuho commented on this pull request.

> @@ -4380,12 +4380,10 @@ support the spin bit MUST implement it as specified in this section.
 Each endpoint unilaterally decides if the spin bit is enabled or disabled for a
 connection. Implementations MUST allow administrators of clients and servers
 to disable the spin bit either globally or on a per-connection basis. Even when
-the spin bit is not disabled by the administrator, implementations MUST disable
-the spin bit for a given connection with a certain likelihood. The random
-selection process SHOULD be designed such that on average the spin bit is
-disabled for at least one eighth of network paths. The selection process
-performed at the beginning of the connection SHOULD be applied for all paths
-used by the connection.

I see the last sentence being dropped in the updated text. Is that intentional?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: