Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment via header block acknowledgment (#1399)

[Martin Thomson <[e-mail]>]

martinthomson commented on this pull request.



> @@ -523,6 +530,12 @@ blocks within a stream have been fully processed.
 ~~~~~~~~~~
 {:#fig-header-ack title="Header Acknowledgement"}
 
+An encoder MUST treat receipt of a Header Acknowledgment as also acknowledging
+any dynamic table entries that the header block referenced.  That is, this
+instruction is also processed as a Table Size Synchronize instruction with a
+value matching the Largest Reference of the corresponding header block.

Damn, really?  That's more efficient, I agree, but I completely missed that.  (My fault, not the spec.)  Since these are on the same stream, I think that we can make TSS incremental and avoid having two counters.

Now I have to fix my code...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1399#discussion_r191968112