Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 14 November 2018 00:45 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE0D130DF5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:45:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IoMBCmbagwDS for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB09130DC2 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:45:21 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1542156321; bh=muGfCV0N/P1QsfcvbjplI3w3wA19JZDjIun1zk8S8xs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=vH+ILMz6WHdccIV/KLEEGJHjSy7jPJ+gZIylD7fZcG35VyHNjCsCHa4LHYppj43m0 /ODWSunSlVW9/+IXqfhW6+euHEm8F8n0uvqsAOT3OAGUd0ewXIvKeUcS8ms3ZCQvMS 7ki2/ij0e/el1/5S7DeMOVsjcYlod/A/052HLHsc=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab3856bb7f3a19e270a30b987e39c1204d63fccaed92cf000000011803322192a169ce169265bd@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982/review/174654553@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5beb70216fa45_71273faa6aad45b8396159"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Unb2cxCgTQo-LqzSLr-s_K0mLM0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:45:25 -0000
martinthomson commented on this pull request. This is essentially right, but I think that this needs to be primarily per-path, with an allowance for per-connection ID. > -When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to zero, +The selection process SHOULD be designed such that +on average the spin bit is disabled for at least 1/8th of the connections, or ```suggestion on average the spin bit is disabled for at least one eighth of network paths. ``` > -When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to zero, +The selection process SHOULD be designed such that +on average the spin bit is disabled for at least 1/8th of the connections, or +1/8th of the paths when doing migrations. The random choice SHOULD be dependent ```suggestion The random choice SHOULD be dependent ``` > -When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to zero, +The selection process SHOULD be designed such that +on average the spin bit is disabled for at least 1/8th of the connections, or +1/8th of the paths when doing migrations. The random choice SHOULD be dependent +on the source and destination addresses of the connection, ```suggestion on the source and destination addresses of the path, ``` > -When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to zero, +The selection process SHOULD be designed such that +on average the spin bit is disabled for at least 1/8th of the connections, or +1/8th of the paths when doing migrations. The random choice SHOULD be dependent +on the source and destination addresses of the connection, +so that the spin bit is consistently enabled or +disabled for repeated connections between the same addresses. ```suggestion disabled for repeated use of the same path. ``` > -When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to zero, +The selection process SHOULD be designed such that +on average the spin bit is disabled for at least 1/8th of the connections, or +1/8th of the paths when doing migrations. The random choice SHOULD be dependent +on the source and destination addresses of the connection, +so that the spin bit is consistently enabled or +disabled for repeated connections between the same addresses. + +When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to +a constant value randomly chosen to be 0 or 1, ```suggestion a constant value that is randomly chosen to be 0 or 1 for the path, ``` > -When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to zero, +The selection process SHOULD be designed such that +on average the spin bit is disabled for at least 1/8th of the connections, or +1/8th of the paths when doing migrations. The random choice SHOULD be dependent +on the source and destination addresses of the connection, +so that the spin bit is consistently enabled or +disabled for repeated connections between the same addresses. + +When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to +a constant value randomly chosen to be 0 or 1, regardless of the values received from their peer. Addendums or revisions to ```suggestion regardless of the values received from their peer. Alternatively, endpoints MAY change this value when changing connection ID. Addendums or revisions to ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982#pullrequestreview-174654553
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) erickinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Loganaden Velvindron
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) erickinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) erickinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) erickinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Brad Lassey
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Brad Lassey
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Brad Lassey
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Brad Lassey
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982) Martin Thomson