Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet reordering thresholds less than 3 are not sufficiently reordering tolerant (#3256)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 18 November 2019 06:35 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F016120877 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:35:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GEHFseGYOeTS for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F1771200B3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-e8b54ca.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-e8b54ca.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.23.39]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B700A05FF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:35:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1574058905; bh=zB3XJE9zpfcF55u+q7Z1jC2eVr3IXl2mPPUM92A5soY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=BnniOunbEwzdcwbH0K/PN9QofqZvIPRXxEZaFDWGrP9uO9aO0bt4QRCcr7cinC6/V JUalWukB35dvASaZYJsUUv6v/0OQ4AKua6TGU3eYujdvBGh4N8ir2x0ffSmrvQfhf1 IKWu4C6Dmo357brFjjgFOjISfmwqnJ2B1XmD4MIA=
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:35:05 -0800
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZ6XUJWXSI42J7HHCN335XBTEVBNHHB6PQ4TQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3256/554873415@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3256@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3256@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet reordering thresholds less than 3 are not sufficiently reordering tolerant (#3256)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd23b995c653_2c1e3fea452cd96c878cc"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/UsFCipLvz-wcMenW0Bh2gTO5RTo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 06:35:07 -0000

FWIW, I think this is likely design because it adds a SHOULD NOT, but it also doesn't substantively change the existing recommendation.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3256#issuecomment-554873415