Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypting Retry token (#3274)

Jana Iyengar <> Fri, 06 December 2019 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862071200FE for <>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 12:08:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vwVKBYFwBca6 for <>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 12:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 326041200EB for <>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 12:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 12:08:14 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1575662894; bh=1CgMhcNRBkqE+uA6Ji+BSPyet6HGSXOKkGKK7ArHTwE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=080TSe3oakofREWb9Pk7hIUO9VN5MPM0ikkRhfP+pjvgCR48VCXmHMCeCQvh8cCIV QAmVg/G39iqFMpgczPSHj9R2GWYI35NFbf+JBXv4NAaJMEyKt4xMDl1g74SgxT9Xu6 PpxzhVFGa84xGncAYqMEpzDhi6383BVYr8MSBrCs=
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypting Retry token (#3274)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5deab52e3af45_32d23f8412ccd96091653"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 20:08:16 -0000

I'm in agreement with @nibanks. My interest here is to detect corruption of Retry packets, and a ghash (equivalent) is adequate. Everything else is a nice to have... and I don't care much for these.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: