Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove mention of round-trip time in HTTP/3 (#3346)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Wed, 15 January 2020 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B844F120058 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:44:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a4AAzTnCJSbZ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:44:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA9512002F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:44:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-c53a806.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-c53a806.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.23.45]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666AF6E0C3A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:44:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1579049083; bh=SXDhMKTOONZLefZRe7uImxsD6lVWmQ7zDDoTupWCaIQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=AEUPGwoAkFqQgi1EmQvl0/lekvjPpYD1Jc33g7pm5H2wtIDe54+0d6tPsFnqo2Gjx FqaHl8o3Rv3VGelqixs4a0WVZGxCJGRWnP9tXPbUwJ6WmtCXx8juIp/e55+75X5fyX AyAnwAfsvnpBgBXeZkUt0fmPjob/tTDV0rXHlqzo=
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:44:43 -0800
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYKZ4JTQ54E5HQEJQ54FOJPXEVBNHHCBRWHCM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3346/574442975@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3346@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3346@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove mention of round-trip time in HTTP/3 (#3346)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e1e607b5663f_49663fa3a06cd968964d5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/V4Q6jvh-OUyQEQ2dlZDf989TDfU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:44:46 -0000

Regarding how we should change, maybe something like below would be sufficient. My observation is that we can drop "at least one round-trip time" because the text that directly precede that implies that already.

"After allowing time for any in-flight requests to reach the server, the server MAY send another GOAWAY frame that carries the greatest request stream ID it has seen. This ensures that a connection can be cleanly shut down without losing requests."


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3346#issuecomment-574442975