Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify text around preferred address (#3589)

[Mike Bishop <[e-mail]>]

@MikeBishop approved this pull request.

For the semicolon ones which aren't in text you're actually changing, it might be better to leave them and do a separate editorial PR that cleans these up.  I'm sure the ones that hit the updated reference aren't the only ones.

> +Similarly, an endpoint MUST NOT reuse a connection ID when sending to more than
+one destination address, for example when responding to a change in the address
+of a peer if the packet with the new peer address uses an active connection ID
+that has not been previously used by the peer.

This is more precise, but still feels a little obtuse.  Would it be clearer to switch this into an exception?
```suggestion
Similarly, an endpoint MUST NOT reuse a connection ID when sending to more than
one destination address.  However, if an endpoint receives packets from a new
source address with the same destination connection ID, it MAY continue to use
the current connection ID with the new address.
```

> @@ -5654,7 +5663,7 @@ RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames contain the following fields:
 Sequence Number:
 
 : The sequence number of the connection ID being retired.  See

```suggestion
: The sequence number of the connection ID being retired; see
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3589#pullrequestreview-396590152