Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Boolean blocked streams setting (#3073)

Dmitri Tikhonov <> Thu, 17 October 2019 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C7512000F for <>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4Z_o1h3fCTU for <>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B54C61200B8 for <>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=x48bBiToJoubtYgiJRZfT2kd8/8=; b=jUuMd8tYLuD94L4t BRD3+Rq7JUjaEqFrTCq4ofPkdpuNiu1hAM4AF2SNmVfZgu1alpUhd/rRJbaCKcBV kB4tTfnrGEoHdXt4aoKAyck5cnseDbykwSAIHUTut3aoB9wS55+ZhIC4zcp2+zlA n1cvM47HB0WFYrKa4T57guJVVTc=
Received: by with SMTP id filter0803p1iad2-8485-5DA875CB-4E 2019-10-17 14:08:11.862309468 +0000 UTC m=+51910.999458420
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id Vh-rrMSFQkmOmEkqf-cmYA for <>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:08:11.857 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B517EC0A31 for <>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:08:11 +0000
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3073/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Boolean blocked streams setting (#3073)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5da875cbb3445_759d3fe37cccd96424549f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: dtikhonov
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1auSm4vKZJfv6ebjoYDlDsZBWOx1U0j38NjZ XvGF3ii/qgksdu38MSQ4JHL4nZGexX6BLpmUyPVEeXTUFijQphF54q+hOxFs87kMdOSPgE0FH7lFdd D3xyQ6MRkAnw1VBlXkQChVUy/QhXQs6ViqZKRk48s2mfZQtsvS1+MtXTsy8ttZE+f3c7izfqgPmRDz 0=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:08:15 -0000

@afrind writes:

> As for a use case, lately I've been working with our RPC over HTTP stack, which generally sets the stream limit in the 100k range. There's more of a case to be made for keeping the QPACK blocking limit lower than the stream limit when you've got a bonkers stream limit.

This is a good example.  A decoder may want to allow *some* number of blocked headers without having to implement a data structure that can scale to 100K entries.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: