[quicwg/base-drafts] Should server TP encryption be a requirement for the cryptographic handshake? (#2920)
Christopher Wood <notifications@github.com> Sun, 21 July 2019 20:47 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB8E12014A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 13:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OexB2o3i0eSf for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 13:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71BF5120147 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 13:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 13:47:47 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1563742067; bh=Ygqhezd4OIUGZXjhOMz/BeWEC3IiAOjjyToe9WEsa9s=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=GvwCf2BAveyLL3bLgF+DvcuK9wfGxwcPT+1npxgfwYA5XiE83qr/75XHPy53JH41l VAeHNXW+CraWHo01F/ufJ3F862hR+RIqG37x1t9laCSzorLtDjdsbTeKQgj/BnkXMy 92k5nPRpC8WQwR4MfVwBma954h9fszH5XX93f2AA=
From: Christopher Wood <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5YAQODRAUBOIWTSZ53IIA7HEVBNHHBYEBQTA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2920@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should server TP encryption be a requirement for the cryptographic handshake? (#2920)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d34cf7338f54_75443f91a72cd968102966a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: chris-wood
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/V8LM6A2YC2nZC-QUxF0L5hL902I>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 20:47:51 -0000
The TPs might carry a stateless reset token, which must be encrypted in transit. Section 7 lists some requirements for the handshake, including authentication of the TPs, yet does not include any mention of encrypting them from server to client. Should it? cc @DavidSchinazi @martinthomson -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2920
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Should server TP encryption … Christopher Wood
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should server TP encrypt… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should server TP encrypt… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should server TP encrypt… Martin Thomson