Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove SETTINGS[_ACK] (#181)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 24 January 2017 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD9112946E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:37:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.037
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l2wVSMdWdpil for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:37:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o6.sgmail.github.com (o6.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC9B12946D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:37:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=dbVWviN1P0D5RDKLIoTy+eXVFa8=; b=LBIVJ90PBExfqfLS 7ACkVgJoowOgsTQ/Goore+h9BiDPN5AYh0Gohx0ipoKvtd/01ji4DHrq26tgIpJN NpXjtUrkrgG8m9Ea6V4IUcT1yc9/ckHc99Ys04SgsBCKeAgka2giV4VXPpKY0ASM fSLIBhcCYCkjqDe63DRe/PmuwDQ=
Received: by filter0594p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0594p1mdw1-29256-5886A1AF-43 2017-01-24 00:37:03.353237588 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0005p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id icQhKTEHTUux-1fYJKPQPg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:37:03.277 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:37:03 -0800
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/181/274664631@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/181@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/181@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove SETTINGS[_ACK] (#181)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5886a1af26bfc_3a13ff5f916f13c483f9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2Km85nM+vOV62RMJTisCRivlzK37azlFQHAv dHfDAsahVemoPYLDjKMKNBv3pukCIPF7VUsX2pQPeJDrYCx8YZfBC7D5q4plLpJhv9+6/GmTe93pMu 3tqYoLiZnBrU96Kgmil8e5Svpt2Req7IoMJpwXnfOFgfIHQhL9c6lE01+5PNvlDpBHXJVciNN8aJyc A=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/VAy2LObKdaEPTbp6WNVn9lWhTnI>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:37:15 -0000

I don't understand how you could possibly add another application protocol in the way you describe.

Yes, there is a fingerprinting risk, however for the settings that we have, the values are likely selected from a small fixed set of values.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/181#issuecomment-274664631