Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit the size of packets (#501)

janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Fri, 05 May 2017 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097A9127B57 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 18:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.183
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.183 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55q-sLlgjRA9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 18:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 469771250B8 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 18:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=/BXLZSk25J9jJDh4kTeF748uAu8=; b=PTLy+ZegeqIYNiF8 Wxsyp22FECbDBwRnEC1ajueMu9k2Dz30n6Y0Ds+Ans8tDkCGCnzLqh8cIa9EOB5D dcSa75j+B8m4HjIphE1t4rEpOe5w+tLFAh6bjPGBcyVfq7b/fTkfcPBMdirvwT79 J9vExRXADRmccOw+oe/4IX6EodA=
Received: by filter0896p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0896p1mdw1-18297-590BD58C-14 2017-05-05 01:29:48.415461981 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0002p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id eLPzM106T76bT6WU23OnBw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 May 2017 01:29:48.386 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 18:29:48 -0700
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab6ef1ef7badd43ca5bccf173d3c65f2dc1ed167a592cf000000011523978c92a169ce0d7b300d@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/501/c299351090@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/501@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/501@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit the size of packets (#501)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_590bd58c4c581_74393fca10ca7c30652a9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3IJUT87ToivLwOQ4YnqEAgasMLo+Pjk66tFK Xna+Ks8IHa+EQOoWXSDOlvC3i4FdisDbSK7S3VrvitFGnSJXdfWoMKJ03Za1LC2mVHykzWt76Wf1B6 ocDo9pCCzaWVoE75RoWO6yBzW2AIfJ2nBXQiRA2pYW3XXKm323z5sgqWYWyxQmtbMzhDU/2l9lwji3 o=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/VJEyUjQuWmxw-It9wYJx1u8LDys>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 01:37:25 -0000

I'm not convinced there's a need. QUIC is pretty complex; I would argue that severely constrained implementations that can't do AEAD over 1280 bytes are unlikely to do QUIC. 

TLS doesn't have the luxury of saying this, since it has to work for every lightbulb.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/501#issuecomment-299351090