Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework idle timeout definition (#2346)
Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com> Fri, 18 January 2019 13:53 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CB9126C7E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 05:53:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ni-uFx6awpUq for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 05:53:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B745124BE5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 05:53:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 05:53:11 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1547819591; bh=gyTp6yVdPSpaDgZP0esYJFSstknX4IjgZSF2xrhKg0Y=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=vj4L1Ux7JgLmRIoevtl9IlxoOyhuBEXqB4jrgpWSE0nmYjCxExruDlRhl7c6LIf6i ubFg5e3laNxK00ZOHvx8QW0E3F9cCCl7IddL73L6FsN8AQNKOarQCsKIUH3P9S7zCk ng0cRWN7YzSjaizWwCKV7txs/AqrYi0/FN8IhHV4=
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abf70564f67b4170514a9781b3df4a17758b2af80692cf0000000118599c4792a169ce17e0c3bd@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2346/review/194104002@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2346@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2346@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework idle timeout definition (#2346)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c41da47175f4_39373fa9c46d45b8338360"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: dtikhonov
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/VTTINlqsZHCwl-UAOABMtApjufs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 13:53:15 -0000
dtikhonov commented on this pull request. > @@ -2242,14 +2242,13 @@ If the idle timeout is enabled, a connection that remains idle for longer than the advertised idle timeout (see {{transport-parameter-definitions}}) is closed. A connection enters the draining state when the idle timeout expires. -Each endpoint advertises its own idle timeout to its peer. The idle timeout -starts from the last packet received. In order to ensure that initiating new -activity postpones an idle timeout, an endpoint restarts this timer when sending -a packet. An endpoint does not postpone the idle timeout if another packet has -been sent containing frames other than ACK or PADDING, and that other packet has -not been acknowledged or declared lost. Packets that contain only ACK or -PADDING frames are not acknowledged until an endpoint has other frames to send, -so they could prevent the timeout from being refreshed. +Each endpoint advertises its own idle timeout to its peer. Endpoints restart I'd switch to the singular number: > _An enpdpoint restarts any timer it maintains when a packet from its peer_.... As it stands, it sounds as if several endpoints had a single peer. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2346#pullrequestreview-194104002
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework idle timeout definiti… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework idle timeout defi… Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework idle timeout defi… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework idle timeout defi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework idle timeout defi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework idle timeout defi… Martin Thomson