Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify how to handle Retry, as well as stating that a fixed mapping bet. versions and salts is better than nothing (373257b)

Mike Bishop <> Wed, 30 October 2019 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BD5120874 for <>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HkXg4ESj7PS for <>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32432120852 for <>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA7A1C2F53 for <>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572464450; bh=JKqjaHhAiy6E7nbc7JrCCPKEUtnbFPq1NTHqgcwrDAQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=pnQpzRdMjZy93IuZfespjuAiV3ZjXk9em5TO0Wy/MoyYJ1L6JTLVnZto9BrlycZPc b+ItOmK6VHbAUmyK1XLQEU6OgYQGzzf2BH9q7W7M5q5mX2JXqRGUackmOmmXVtvL1h wYd3wXBD68nBjfSzwKQapMyie3+Nfb5aWWiZoCac=
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:40:50 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/373257b7b105ec5fff5251e0dcec0944970c0076/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify how to handle Retry, as well as stating that a fixed mapping bet. versions and salts is better than nothing (373257b)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db9e7426b3e6_289d3f8edb0cd95c14264c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 19:40:52 -0000

This is one possible design, for a server that wants to do minimal work.  A server could, however, extract the salt and put it in the Retry token, no?  We should word this as a suggested implementation, not as the only one.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: