Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify how to handle Retry, as well as stating that a fixed mapping bet. versions and salts is better than nothing (373257b)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Wed, 30 October 2019 19:40 UTC

Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:40:50 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4XBJIZXWUQNHNWCCF3Y4T5FEVBMPHAEIKISM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/373257b7b105ec5fff5251e0dcec0944970c0076/35735699@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/373257b7b105ec5fff5251e0dcec0944970c0076@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/373257b7b105ec5fff5251e0dcec0944970c0076@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify how to handle Retry, as well as stating that a fixed mapping bet. versions and salts is better than nothing (373257b)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db9e7426b3e6_289d3f8edb0cd95c14264c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/VVQae2TXpcxyXg4Hcocm8EJwics>

This is one possible design, for a server that wants to do minimal work.  A server could, however, extract the salt and put it in the Retry token, no?  We should word this as a suggested implementation, not as the only one.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/commit/373257b7b105ec5fff5251e0dcec0944970c0076#commitcomment-35735699

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify how to handle Re… Mike Bishop
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify how to handle Re… Kazuho Oku