Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] unrecoverable loss pattern leads to deadlock (#2863)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Mon, 01 July 2019 04:22 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76C01201F1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 21:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F6RRwb2r30py for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 21:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3FD51201F0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 21:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 21:22:14 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1561954934; bh=RnvtOkgySNRLB6jLSzec74Drzgj4HaLnBzNwnka1Jok=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=vNbsSha+h5tXNJ4tcMhgnyMZGBT605hbeDKAUxQ6HD/p4Gq0fGVD3LX0gB4ioNZ+h qF7hHkoUl1xfTHStff2P9dpM2lbwpg/NMdeKDmRlyUq4KOnYnjOT0frcThhtWszu9W uwRUwUgH1zT+1sInh0ttGNq0yhTKt7kk6DpttcCY=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6N6YWB7MJAITWKR2N3E26PNEVBNHHBXDZPBM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2863/507110454@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2863@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2863@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] unrecoverable loss pattern leads to deadlock (#2863)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d198a761b65c_4033fa9262cd968376336"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/VqOJS3SSb4p3CgmDgkZAmo8zDnw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 04:22:18 -0000

> Would it be enough to say that "unless an endpoint sends some ack-eliciting data in 1-RTT packets, the handshake might remain unconfirmed indefinitely" and leave it at that?

No i think the state needs to progress. Resources might be tied up and timeouts might be in place to weed out bad handshakes before a longer or indefinite idle timeout.

I would say the client MUST send at least one ack-eliciting 1-RTT packet once it is able to do so, and within, say, 1 PTO.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2863#issuecomment-507110454