IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do Initial secrets change after Retry packet? (#2823)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 08 July 2019 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE081200F6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 14:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hA44UNHlUWTF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 14:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CB51120073 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 14:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 14:11:54 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1562620314; bh=4wYRgTXDDG2S9knTAXzWOX7rYmLkUqoCU4e/ic3+GB4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=A+qSLEZpkaeVPChcAdLVMwGwMJ2B+VTrMFk9nMbyGxRR8Rdklk1/bVp0MmWzxfW3U XqkoUsGWx0+PWeREh2pbER5YigzKVM3FkDHnQAW2axMm6neam58AAunfPW+OJSL3bv uQzRQkLhU1fTzWxJY6G13h2pMtOHPuE1OIXyJgCc=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2FOVGB3UWJHN3QTT53GDSBVEVBNHHBWWQD7M@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2823/509393487@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2823@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2823@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do Initial secrets change after Retry packet? (#2823)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d23b19aaac07_770b3f7efa0cd95c218074e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/VqTW6GAYsKcW7SxRHfpaeQ5FDTs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 21:11:58 -0000

This is marked as editorial, but 3 seems like the most non-obvious design choice, and it's not clear we intended to make that choice.

If extracting the original CID is potentially too difficult for some, why not 2, which only uses local state to process Initial packets?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2823#issuecomment-509393487

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status