IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] May use 64+bit CIDs as address validation (#3924)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Tue, 21 July 2020 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0437A3A1310 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.483
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xvd0wKWqyvLh for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-21.smtp.github.com (out-21.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 938723A130F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-5fb2734.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-5fb2734.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.19.27]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCD7A116E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1595299166; bh=fui3XADtNDRM2BrnAvIavih8PTI/zvpiEAvzMPHyPvo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=0BX6joEtrbn+Xrr7WKWLfL2eU3BNXLUUId8Evwv1eOHrsUzzHfYEinX6uLB1WnPsR TrTe3jkDhaZ9NpOO/MaD04oX52hhoR04W0Ui5eY86uIcEkTsQ8Jj0usGWl/I341jw9 ISdtHLEDJr4a6wX0IfTq0g1r5gBayTVkvHVE4nfw=
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:39:26 -0700
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2ACVT64NAKMZ3DWO55EI3F5EVBNHHCO46JVM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3924/review/452086280@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3924@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3924@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] May use 64+bit CIDs as address validation (#3924)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f16555eb151d_2f933fc149ecd96c468321"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/VsSffFQ_DMMywYswJvvqBayEQHU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 02:39:29 -0000

@janaiyengar commented on this pull request.



> +consider the client address to have been validated.  Servers MAY treat the
+receipt of a packet using a server-generated destination connection ID with
+at least 64 bits of entropy as address validation.

```suggestion
consider the client address to have been validated.

Additionally, if a server sends a packet carrying a Source Connection
ID field that has at least 64 bits of entropy to a client address,
and if the server subsequently receives a packet from the client
carrying this server-generated connection ID in its Destination
Connection ID field, the server MAY consider the address to be
validated.
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3924#pullrequestreview-452086280

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status