[quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-path calculation of loss and congestion of QUIC flows (#632)

Brian Trammell <notifications@github.com> Wed, 14 June 2017 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631E312EC2E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8HpMfr9rTnBI for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o7.sgmail.github.com (o7.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4226F12EC2D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Pz6A1N1ZQ+VI0wDVJTBs1XpHUXc=; b=VlqcpbpEotzHjbgl 1Y77jsmjIB2Exd6/CA23zo6jFC768y2DpZnD30U8CiSfcVyFdIZLye5jPpj/FxHJ KpCdRa5reOwyl8PK0YijHv7gBBtGmtXoqtvYejh0/qM3Qef/Ycd5SvW/ieI1rpIv 2IM08BMr0DeVgUO9O7u2KYuX2Pk=
Received: by filter0825p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0825p1mdw1-26799-59414A96-53 2017-06-14 14:39:18.821624867 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0006p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id tmjRXxq-Q4qSR6rsb881Bw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:39:18.795 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:39:18 -0700
From: Brian Trammell <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abec657f59e71847c36a75783c40671f4ac459bd3e92cf0000000115590c9692a169ce0e0f95f5@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/632@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-path calculation of loss and congestion of QUIC flows (#632)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59414a96ab9f9_25c83fa6c218dc30645db"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: britram
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0aQmXuRA81Dp9YN01YSvqw2YLKPRjAep4nkH pa6jV5gPX2x9FNPKIDADHUfdwXFO2aMn1wlY7lz5mxQKb/m0DYUH2v7Sl0zsNF8S5OP/6jk5GXrDCh C8Z8w1WfbHVByWDLVfnC40h5xI/2sdpN3LNwC7fDAt7Qw46FreMdJ06+cT9fRT/uf8FAClLrjZplIU c=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/W41N_k7x2DtDwE-UT_G7wcUxPFI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:39:33 -0000

It might be useful for on-path devices to be able to calculate the (1) loss and (2) non-loss indication of congestion (i.e., ECN) experienced by each side of a QUIC flow from a single observation point.

Since #609 essentially marks every congestion window of a QUIC flow with an alternating spin, evaluation of the time-series of congestion window sizes could allow passive analysis of congestion window reductions, from which loss can be inferred if the assumption that the sender is using loss-based congestion control is valid.

A less inference-based solution would be something like the loss bit discussed in #279.

An even more explicit way to do this would be to implement something like [ConEx](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7713) in the QUIC short header. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/632