IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider moving ACK/STOP_WAITING into the packet header (#70)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Mon, 05 December 2016 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971A3129CAF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:12:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66TV0PzUcbhU for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:12:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o10.sgmail.github.com (o10.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9A22129CA3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:12:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=9GfR15N1RelpVXuLU6E+H9Breas=; b=lqFgVdU7Hatozzuy fs2VExpmFymDI40QqEPY4YSHBDWloeb+lJJio7frnwGI00nPghywkakKspjE2iRB T7ZfAw2JMY2/+1NKr9qOw9CSGPNYUiNdNnnZkJbg9NnykFywtR5aYcg72jCVsTpq C96aFg/5W0yP/bmWO2hizsT3wOY=
Received: by filter0646p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0646p1mdw1-6092-5845BC26-30 2016-12-05 19:12:38.623400166 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0006p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id RJYIaSoiRTuHy-21MDDEMA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 19:12:38.603 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:12:38 -0800
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/70/264946933@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/70@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/70@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider moving ACK/STOP_WAITING into the packet header (#70)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5845bc268256c_5a193f94f64e713423945c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0Z6qm7PExwPC6dcXMsH0qZJBD7ylvbakH9Ai NDOnrOEfE233FH25S0v6Tz5OTLWgge88ADAMnwxn9pWiNS4JyG/CKgs4yKvtSQ31dkqo8eNUTxSp6U LVBJ3Up4hJ50bVv79es/rpuo2UySJ5cYrQB3YXbF6XzpooSellLb4rWe3KpQizbqi9SuCe9X5/Ap2n 8=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/W4gNt2qX99KIjnfxzZGfV1MUfP8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abb1af454325bbbb14af7359cb079d944a037d325592cf00000001145d7e2692a169ce0b89d37c@reply.github.com>
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 19:12:41 -0000

And I think that's the distinction.  If we had an encrypted header region, it could logically hold a lot of the connection-level information.  Of course, if we allow that set of stuff to be extensible, it could wind up looking a lot like frames.  ;-)  Updating the title to better reflect the suggestion.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/70#issuecomment-264946933

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status