Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)

martinduke <notifications@github.com> Thu, 04 January 2018 23:33 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55811273E2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:33:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.412
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.412 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P_Y6iPThkdfI for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:33:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o10.sgmail.github.com (o10.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60044126CF9 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:33:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=0cCWIdw/qWIzKSf3TF6oP237o6E=; b=iXwalDDFp86uqoD9 8x3yn4tWX9O3Hlx9O9u0oxLlKDgVzGLtu0hAva/TgpZGuXEBiIB2Y8HW7bElg4mi yfh83x433s1qCOrLK5zFIzrOcbtKL3g3aF6wkC/tZB4YUNiP1mxVXpcgeSKY18zc DH3DpYGkI5DhQT1Ec8sWeR2n1AI=
Received: by filter1227p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1227p1mdw1-21288-5A4EB9AA-4E 2018-01-04 23:32:58.824210875 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0006p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id fGpwNI9uQfm-_tlNFJwLTQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:32:58.802 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:32:58 +0000
From: martinduke <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab81327537affed31541faf235fc6c8f449a85cc2d92cf0000000116667baa92a169ce110b3aac@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1036/review/86790343@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1036@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1036@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a4eb9aaab046_56e13f9f05784f2c133526"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1A6p7lOKxtFWRr5JcmbQx+j0IKjx+kWEJuKK hGeWHYshXqVsyE3B7Ri7pyivwih4gEhPi8NNSDoRv3qN/mESTqI/9cRccYVIJ0oMCjCb9q3WLgqGu2 Tc8LlLMX44v9mi/P0ODi6qIHLNGQdBG5SpDEBtI63MQwUVCvtRIFMo7MDHOyTaWfoduSGgkpPg4+Su E=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/W7hrMd8DG_p0Ksmcqhbce03wpvQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:33:02 -0000

martinduke requested changes on this pull request.

I don't care much one way or the other whether we include this, but if so I would suggest the following rephrasing, inserted not in its own section but after the  phrase "...1252 octets for IPv4".

"Some QUIC implementations MAY wish to be more conservative in computing allowed QUIC packet size given unknown tunneling overheads or IP header options."

I think that's sufficient, if people would like to see explicit language on this subject.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1036#pullrequestreview-86790343