Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be in us, not ms (#3363)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Mon, 20 January 2020 06:25 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E752120043 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:25:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CDr-6wnAVD8a for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-27.smtp.github.com (out-27.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36F5C120025 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-45eca55.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-45eca55.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.70]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A3CE00B3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:25:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1579501538; bh=6yrlTwnBfCON1etZrMKCfSx7rHQwwkn8cAHTSTQC1CA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=YpU9QvjYYslptqDormhzXXWiSygPtK8k2Zd+xdJ/qbinYn9+fz3USLmOFwZzjrSxB F7fiUT2NWBql7777TINV4cP+1LyZlIdJUEICB5pz4ZFT4lGJuZBzvblWdU2bNB5Uyy W9kZUWMRotun3l3256/eToNsm0yvF0OoXUgft75k=
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:25:38 -0800
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3OYWOZJNA6D4KY75V4GJ5GFEVBNHHCBYTETM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363/576125521@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be in us, not ms (#3363)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e2547e2535cf_3b5e3fb9598cd9609551e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/W7p7bmYjCM3C6uwQQlBYDgU6LqY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:25:41 -0000
This is a big fat design issue that will have a serious impact on existing implementations. It sounds perfectly reasonable, but we'll need to run the process. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363#issuecomment-576125521
- [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be in u… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … ianswett