Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] encoding of CONNECTION_CLOSE reason phrases (#1990)

[janaiyengar <[e-mail]>]

(I do think the protocol is in English and Binary. The protocol is not only
what's on the wire, it's also what to do with the bits, and that's the RFC.
I'll concede that there can be translations though.)

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:40 AM Mike Bishop <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> @janaiyengar <https://github.com/janaiyengar>, the protocol isn't in
> English, it's in binary. The RFC is in English, but that doesn't mean there
> won't be translations later. (E.g. RFC7540 in Chinese
> <https://github.com/abbshr/rfc7540-translation-zh_cn>)
>
> This is ultimately useful for the developer of the implementation emitting
> it, so they know what language to expect there. The key requirement for
> everyone else is something easy to log and relay back to that developer,
> and I think UTF-8 is our best option there. I'd support MUST UTF-8.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1990#issuecomment-438418928>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKjg1KgJ8senerh3wILBYg-bsM2BMbBHks5uuycygaJpZM4YYWmQ>
> .
>


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1990#issuecomment-438909280