Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid argument for the Table State Synchronize instruction? (#1736)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Mon, 10 September 2018 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489D1130FB7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D_FaeSZbmqQQ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153D2130FB2 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=yMG/A8ItGZJR1B4yAzAJGNp5oWs=; b=r23nb0pucHpJD40a Iseoo+8ODXc/aZ+GWanb+q7gqNPmyg/YCzsKc8rtdrkLS50fwdMjSm6jCZlEzZsr kNb85Yc4CSHBzLHgm4PfJSewnOPYm3mb1xkL+VF4yLVM/nzNVdUAOtTrPWYFFI9+ XYmkvbEiVVfn5jGE8W9ACkglM/o=
Received: by filter0783p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0783p1las1-25801-5B96E904-A 2018-09-10 21:58:28.245651644 +0000 UTC m=+347307.227157967
Received: from github-lowworker-89d05ac.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.35]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id ssFI5uBXTzCLjukfpfl2vw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 21:58:28.083 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-89d05ac.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFBFAE0336 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 21:58:28 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab2c3285a70988cfcaa91cc39369d2a15ccada646892cf0000000117aeab0492a169ce155d42c5@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1736/420075153@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1736@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1736@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid argument for the Table State Synchronize instruction? (#1736)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b96e904e198_71583ff78eed45c0306691"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1z0IIr6FyUpTBL09csYgcrh862r45f0RGF38 yf7cDejS3utfUSM0ohr3F3y6anE3rJKsvPhCulio7m61HoPHeSh2B81gIGLjJyIEmlonEjjWi2fRSv jNd/tpzRLiZOtwCPdoARWT7keHNhr6iHMems9+NX+7+ESr4lEdroDuL9zK8AzuUO9i64/7a9DzLJi3 Y=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/WcY03yeS_StHhqWnz2Xv4T544Ec>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 21:58:30 -0000

If it's valid, the literal interpretation of it would be no-op.  I would be opposed to allowing an instruction that would move the value backwards, but having no effect seems relatively unobjectionable.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1736#issuecomment-420075153