Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] explain that and endpoint cannot expect the delivery of the peer's settings (5fadbbb)

Martin Thomson <> Mon, 26 August 2019 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8097F12009E for <>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LaiVfuZa2gmY for <>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DF2012006D for <>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:35:40 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1566862540; bh=ep5dIqshv3LgRRhOWIcyI9G1a/qL7hBFnqhYwjzOX+U=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Cr/B0TgaGVkuUIH+FRAxhBG0/Fa1NiFhWsVM0ULA1dOss/qTF6bsmVonfcgXHJLdq KYKtyo/m/QIc7qTtTh3+M6BwJI7tiMPOiRmXwdw34q9iSGAIbMmxKw9lARzOm4VUgf CkZ2hQLo15GHbq+DWWaGda1AmNNc97E6k0uFHZRo=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/5fadbbbff7a5e566a2c951376be7999aca2c7edb/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] explain that and endpoint cannot expect the delivery of the peer's settings (5fadbbb)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d646ccc62e95_7a373f8e3a2cd960631448"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:35:43 -0000

Yeah, I don't think that this would be helpful.  I don't see how postponement of transmission in that sort of arbitrary fashion would be a good idea.  Sure, lost packets happen, but the contract is that the message is sent as soon as the connection opens.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: