IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can lead to an unrecoverable situation (#2267)

Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Wed, 30 January 2019 08:19 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED070130EFC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:19:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f9DrLKxiNGH0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA932128CF3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:19:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:19:09 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548836349; bh=0ZJgpw45dTjY2M/g05kCKx2KhUpFYgCMLCt93a6Vd48=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=P6yADWdDRvIqIbh7IS7PE4k+q3ee00crrtuto4va0Mz6qbQcLuUU6GHI8F9GlvX9t QFP7N2Q0aYHB2jimf0Agr/98L8hlhXohPsHdK1TlT7gq1zeAf8nqAvdj2kwbG/klXn P9H4s6S/DXn/+ig9wxPeLwEOMZ4Y3Xs1Us8GWNI4=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abfb9e1105dcc07607087d310e28730cafe49d728392cf0000000118691ffd92a169ce1784eaec@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2267/458852679@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2267@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2267@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can lead to an unrecoverable situation (#2267)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c515dfdee38a_58e93fcf6c2d45bc4341c6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/WyIsRnURoXFBwWpD30dulWBEVDM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:19:13 -0000

Perhaps another way to do this, similar to HANDSHAKE_DONE, would be to have a KEY_RETIRE frame that be used to throw the Initial and Handshake keys away individually. This might be slightly better than the proposed HANDSHAKE_DONE method proposed above because the Initial key could be thrown away earlier than the end of the handshake.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2267#issuecomment-458852679

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status