Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling of corrupt Retry packets (#3014)

Kazuho Oku <> Wed, 11 September 2019 02:30 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68771200C4 for <>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gbrk2LewhmYV for <>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EC97120086 for <>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:30:54 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1568169054; bh=xZ4nKyML8OeHTel7VrVgMHHBiL942Jou51vtup26omQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RVK36IqxaMmfqiCQKerRiKNubzcdd6ZNWVRdY6qfvXy8O3bX4dMBHsQ7kq1lO6ptx o9aDAOHO/S/Xqe7xCq06zK36fIOoeX8bOcHmTcl+IlGe68RfYmf26bll30BHQXmhnt 4RmGH+OWqtHADfkxyo2J9pepziOgEhQfMv+FGioA=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3014/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling of corrupt Retry packets (#3014)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d785c5e6fb2a_23ec3fca988cd960325091"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 02:30:57 -0000

> I don't think it's a huge requirement that QUIC must be sent over a medium that is checksummed. 

I am not sure. I doubt if it would be practical to suggest the could users to ask their could service provider "are you currently using UDP checksums, and committed to using that in the future?" Also, UDP checksums are rewritten by NAT devices, so there is no way to tell for an endpoint if a UDP packet is (was) protected by the UDP checksum.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: