IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Question on ECN validation (#3733)

mirjak <notifications@github.com> Fri, 05 June 2020 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DE13A0845 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rvl9JWPkpBB9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-28.smtp.github.com (out-28.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BFF13A083F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-0f7e7fd.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-0f7e7fd.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.110.17]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9449D8C03BE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1591362528; bh=AxMbDiyLGn9iMV2zituaPWbUfChPsFyekWqTRDec8iQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xMlLvuaK6WVTDk6ubmRcNiY5lC7IQGInB6cPGwcuOckssD8fPgHIjwr1JYu2iZuy1 bjlp9j3ryQsCxnKX6FXHXTv4Dv/37kmuG9yRHPyLUW+bsAPzwUq8hcTNMBaxWRuSoB ws+7yULuCIlfPZM3AOgyjzm8bXUy9j+3OhVs+GTk=
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 06:08:48 -0700
From: mirjak <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK64UP77D7JUS2Q3PIF44YSOBEVBNHHCLJE5JM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733/639469310@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Question on ECN validation (#3733)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eda43e08329a_534a3fc1eb4cd960544b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/WyeP8-wNxc9QpV_2IFSV9KEfKME>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:08:51 -0000

You are supposed to keep three counters for the number of each ECT(0) and ECT(1) and CE mark reported so far on this connection (for this ack space). Increase means the difference of the count reported in the latest ACK compared to the current local counter value. Total increase is increase of ECT(0)+increase of ECT(1)+increase if CE compared to local current count of ECT(0)+ECT(1)+CE. Does that help?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733#issuecomment-639469310

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status