Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] handling of coalesced packets with decryption errors creates DoS opportunity (#2308)

Jana Iyengar <> Thu, 09 May 2019 01:45 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4019A12027D for <>; Wed, 8 May 2019 18:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yY0psobcKBeh for <>; Wed, 8 May 2019 18:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 743ED120286 for <>; Wed, 8 May 2019 18:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 18:45:24 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1557366324; bh=Zq8MBgp5cgHRTODJnI1WCj9QLXnfl1aj/xEntZTK954=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Y89KAuafzCELIeYN3lY3xcMu7XOegI3czSvuAErlD0LQr+oOCObcIZUp22ONywVte tlNJuLNx9NVjIsdJiYiL0pgoh8gCxY1hERORvXnYmvhF+C2VlvbGVUakpF/bE6FWJJ HczBYNBqRnh0mP7BJolRGZ5c5kzcVijRWCOanYBA=
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2308/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] handling of coalesced packets with decryption errors creates DoS opportunity (#2308)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd38634b0653_47823fc6eeecd96c2511bf"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 01:45:30 -0000

Would a note suffice? Something like "an endpoint that coalesces more than a few packets risks having the peer not process all packets." I don't think we need stronger or RFC 2119 language here, just a note for sensible implementation is adequate I think.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: