IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Forgery limits on packet protection (#3619)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Fri, 08 May 2020 07:26 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99CC3A0858 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 00:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jLBjwy2ii_XP for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 00:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D24A03A0853 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 00:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-52827f8.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-52827f8.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.108.24]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19746A1EB8 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 00:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1588922760; bh=CYUQA+n7KpUaSX3CDJQhrdXeH1F4P8SSfuiAfkR+x+M=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=N7VqTYaUDzY0o7E7zF66PoQmdmQoYVG/ycksoE1oLR3m7XSCKenW5uyAVRqOfiisY wWGI3WLQ78+mnlHxWA/mwi8Lz+sDfAUXM5jt9mqVyGtynPn1QNxFgQhyT7jSD+bGQE yKMw8tIRzHfKotlzOFRIgUemAUjZ/4IwRw4ISInc=
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 00:26:00 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5GARSZGTB3JPRWII54YDVIREVBNHHCIZC2Y4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3619/625678827@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3619@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3619@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Forgery limits on packet protection (#3619)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eb50988b2007_74be3feb9cccd964349064"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/XHoodUNq_4SlO0tslBLhStyVJlQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 07:26:05 -0000

Good point about the AD.  The AD - at least for QUIC - is always sent, so that fits in the same space.  We don't necessarily need to double count the tiny number of blocks, but as you say, counting that only once yields a negligible difference.  If we had a large AD that wasn't also transmitted, that would be different.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3619#issuecomment-625678827

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email