Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove PRIORITY (#2924)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Wed, 24 July 2019 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4B712049B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6CsoSqURkDb3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D56F0120614 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:33:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1563996786; bh=qs4CO33O45RcMZMjIIrVPIMP1QR3b6hIjyRmx1p/7j8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=QHRPWO8HP7WIk9U6jePu62Kb52D1ki0eImrjuzDBqsYurUzxTomtYg8zRcq+iV8qV 3YxBCuoHvsTKRBagTludQUjcZIuRDlfKPsT7HibZaDEmSy/WQ+rlX03OTmooQJXdLr RNfKYcjoLgF24I3CYS7QNSURoi2TMXr6+Y+JY9bo=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3ENTL45S5GXCPYGJN3IXSPFEVBNHHBYGBYPM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2924/514769079@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2924@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2924@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove PRIORITY (#2924)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d38b272c0abb_1b3b3faa8c4cd9686328e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/XHw9axBGl4ZNNcySQIwTqtCrJD4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:33:14 -0000

If it's to simple it is not very useful and might prevent something useful from happening.

I like the pmeenan scheme, it seems simple enough and can be negotiated for more advanced behaviour later on. This could easily be a header, and then it is fairly similar to @LPardue and @kazuho's proposal if I understand it right.

Basically: 7 priorities, and 1 concurrency bit in a header. Drop the lower bits if you have fewer levels. Future: use lower level bits for groups if you need it and can negotiate it.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2924#issuecomment-514769079