Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delayed ACK Ratio (#1978)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 05 December 2018 11:38 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F92130DDF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 03:38:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9npi75RBU_gM for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 03:38:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E356130DF9 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 03:38:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 03:38:13 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1544009893; bh=4C2YbK0mw0GepTlEXOCIopbxO1RRfZ16e68+b8ZJNbw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=EDHH+JvWDRRgP+xHMPMtOXCH5yMgn8oK2jzHpMYlC5UeZ3w9N57GnfSySFHhMsUye KPZR0f3SqsHUiIue46TlvoQaPcCLSOD78AZAP6eJaNw4iCx/lQGBJ7jDpQhTwzLqy1 Sll7gS+Kbd4ayjDsN78Oxc97LKJU0C58w5WOB4Wc=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4aba2bf8c5420c93b10fe109d370c467151668b1a5692cf00000001181f7aa592a169ce168acaf3@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1978/444455713@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1978@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1978@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delayed ACK Ratio (#1978)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c07b8a572252_f0d3ff4716d45c0858560"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/XIKs8LwcG69LB6cnOyV188hMFJc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 11:38:21 -0000

@IngJohEricsson, gQUIC has an implementation of what you're describing where K is 4 or 8 and N is 10 or 20, and it works very well in production.

There are some drawbacks to this approach:
 1) Sender and receiver's view of RTT are different, and could be substantially so, so the sender can't rely on the receiver's max ack delay being RTT/K for timeouts.
 2) gQUIC's version is fixed over the lifetime of the connection, but acks every 2 packets for the first 100 under the theory that you want to increase the window quickly in slow start.  But 100 is a fixed value and is too short for some connections slow start and too long for others.  And maybe it should increase to 4 or 8 later in slow start as well?

Given there's interest in this, but it's clearly an area that needs further experimentation, I believe @janaiyengar and I are going to write up an extension draft to allow changing the N value during the connection via a new frame and leave MaxAckDelay fixed for now.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1978#issuecomment-444455713